Battlefield 3 tested with 128 players

[Cain]

Battlefield 3 tested with 128 players

Battlefield 3 tested with 128 players - Battlefield 3

[brian is huh?{CLR}]

dude... 128 or even 200+ players.. where gonna need a MONSTER server.. EA can do it cause they got Super Servers...

but it'll be an all out war.. i could imagine all the people talking on their VOIPs..
but it'll be an awesome roleplaying squads. *drools*

[AmazingRedd]

it be awesome if they leave this as an option for servers, whether you can choose from 64 or 128 in your own server, like cain did with the dod:source server, we went over the limit with 44players instead of 32.

[Apache Warrior]

With servers, bigger is better.
Apache

[K PhaNTOM]

There is such a thing as too big. I mean how big is the map going to have to be to fit all those people in there? And what about servers who still use 32 player limit. 32 players in a 10 squared miles map is not a good idea. I say 64 should be the most. Ever.

[Caddys83]

dude... 128 or even 200+ players.. where gonna need a MONSTER server.. EA can do it cause they got Super Servers...

but it'll be an all out war.. i could imagine all the people talking on their VOIPs..
but it'll be an awesome roleplaying squads. *drools*

I dont think one needs a monster server from what is already out there today. Just the bandwidth to back it up

There is such a thing as too big. I mean how big is the map going to have to be to fit all those people in there? And what about servers who still use 32 player limit. 32 players in a 10 squared miles map is not a good idea. I say 64 should be the most. Ever.

If anything, it would probably be similar to BF2. A 16 player game has a smaller map, 32 is more larger map, and a 64 player map is the full scale map.




On another note:

Project Reality mod guys for BF2 been testing a 128 player server.


http://www.realitymod.com/forum/f10-...ervations.html

[Dead...Again]

I always thought 48 man was a good size...

[Grisu]

128p would be a great step forward.

But I fear the ranked servers from EA will be too expensive...

[Dead_And_Gone]

May not get filled up all the time, but what a battle that would be..
Just WOW!!!!

[Reconsnipe1]

How much was a 64 man server in bf2 a month?

[Apache Warrior]

The Delta Force Franchise has had 128 and 256 man servers for years.
Apache

[MTJ=DK=]

Crazy!!! can't wait to see what happens then 128+ player goes on each-other

-MTJ

[MR_MADHATTER]

I love huge maps and long viewing distances (for wicked sniper shots). I just hope we don't run into the "don't move the Titan" type problems that 2142 had.

[LOCO]

Well i guess you will never see your buddy if he is playing against you on the other side might have to send smoke signals

[Cain]

How much was a 64 man server in bf2 a month?

150 bucks