PDA

View Full Version : Can we add...


slinky317
28th Nov 2006, 10:28 PM
Can we add Minsk and Verdun back into the mix? I loved those maps and they'll bring a changeup from the current smaller-map nonstop onslaught.

Cain
28th Nov 2006, 10:37 PM
Which server ????

goldenfooler
28th Nov 2006, 10:58 PM
i think he refers it to conquest. Hasn't been played since the first week or 2 when other maps were not doing well(at least i think thats was the reason).

On titan i don't think it matters much which map you play on. Frankly once the titans are in the center 4 out of 5 silos can be poded to. Actually to me this ruins part of the game as its just mass jumping around and dying and not much in they way of back and forth play on the ground.

slinky317
28th Nov 2006, 11:16 PM
Oops, yeah, I meant Conquest. Sorry about that. :2thumbs:

Apache Warrior
29th Nov 2006, 06:02 AM
Minsk is played on Titan. :D :2thumbs:
Apache

Dead...Again
29th Nov 2006, 10:24 AM
Minsk is pretty good, but I love Verdun.

Thrashdragon
29th Nov 2006, 10:33 AM
I'm the lone "no" vote so far, I am thoroughly sick of Verdun from beta and Minsk is the default starting map on every server out there.

Rand{CLR}
29th Nov 2006, 11:05 AM
I voted yes, mainly for Verdun as Minsk is very lopsided on Conquest.

I do not like Gibraltar. I do not like Cerbere. They are every bit as unbalanced as Minsk, heavily weighted toward the EU. In general, I want maps with open flags, and lots of space to manuever. There's little I like more than coming in from an unexpected direction and cleaning out a flag area. Choice is good. Vehicles are good. Balance is good.

-Rand

Tuqui-tuqui
29th Nov 2006, 11:17 AM
I voted no.

I want infantry-based maps. Belgrade, Cerbere and Berlin offer head-on face-to-face action which is pretty much non-existant in other maps or Titan.

CAIN! YOU HAVE THE PERFECT ROTATION FOR CONQUEST!! :2thumbs:

Thrashdragon
29th Nov 2006, 11:21 AM
I voted yes, mainly for Verdun as Minsk is very lopsided on Conquest.

I do not like Gibraltar. I do not like Cerbere. They are every bit as unbalanced as Minsk, heavily weighted toward the EU. In general, I want maps with open flags, and lots of space to manuever. There's little I like more than coming in from an unexpected direction and cleaning out a flag area. Choice is good. Vehicles are good. Balance is good.

-Rand

Bah, you just don't like them because there are no tanks! :D

goldenfooler
29th Nov 2006, 11:34 AM
as long as the tank and ground pounder maps number the same you can't blame anyone. If you want a fire fight just get on the titan and pod everywhere you don't have to get into anything for transport.

Rand{CLR}
29th Nov 2006, 02:11 PM
I voted yes, mainly for Verdun as Minsk is very lopsided on Conquest.

I do not like Gibraltar. I do not like Cerbere. They are every bit as unbalanced as Minsk, heavily weighted toward the EU. In general, I want maps with open flags, and lots of space to manuever. There's little I like more than coming in from an unexpected direction and cleaning out a flag area. Choice is good. Vehicles are good. Balance is good.

-Rand

Bah, you just don't like them because there are no tanks! :D

Minsk has a ton of tanks. It still sucks for Conquest. :P

-Rand

marvindecrain
29th Nov 2006, 02:59 PM
this 2 maps are great as a conqest .... great time playing at...

XcrossXFIRE56
29th Nov 2006, 04:16 PM
I voted yes
I haven't played those maps for awhile and I like change

slinky317
29th Nov 2006, 06:03 PM
I voted no.

I want infantry-based maps. Belgrade, Cerbere and Berlin offer head-on face-to-face action which is pretty much non-existant in other maps or Titan.

CAIN! YOU HAVE THE PERFECT ROTATION FOR CONQUEST!! :2thumbs:

I like infantry maps too, but it just seems that all we have on the server our infantry maps. It would be great to mix it up a little. Keep the infantry maps, but add on Minsk and Verdun to mix up the carnage a little.

slinky317
29th Nov 2006, 06:08 PM
I voted yes, mainly for Verdun as Minsk is very lopsided on Conquest.

I do not like Gibraltar. I do not like Cerbere. They are every bit as unbalanced as Minsk, heavily weighted toward the EU. In general, I want maps with open flags, and lots of space to manuever. There's little I like more than coming in from an unexpected direction and cleaning out a flag area. Choice is good. Vehicles are good. Balance is good.

-Rand

Minsk is very much like Wake, in my opinion. Once PAC gets another point, the map is a lot of fun. It just takes a team that's coordinated enough to take another control point using the Doragon instead of flying around trying to kill people in the trenches. Actually, coordination isn't really an issue - it just takes someone who wants to take a point instead of fly around.

Two big differences between Minsk and Wake though is that a) it's a lot easier for the PAC to take a point in Minsk using the Doragon than it was for the USMC to take a point in Wake, and b) it's more fun even if you're stuck in the trenches in Minsk than it was in Wake because you never had a chance to get off the carrier.